“The FA has begun an investigation relating to allegations made following Sunday’s fixture at Stamford Bridge between Chelsea and Manchester United,” it said on its website on Monday.
Leaders Chelsea made an official complaint against Clattenburg, who sent off two home players — Branislav Ivanovic and Fernando Torres — in the highly-charged 3-2 Stamford Bridge defeat.
The club did not name the players he is alleged to have used inappropriate language towards or of what nature the remarks were, but a spokesman refused to deny that Nigerian Mikel Obi had visited the referee’s room and demanded for an apology after the game. It was learnt that his refusal to apologise to Mikel and Chelsea that made the club to launch official complaint to the FA.
Mikel was booked for dissent during the second half.
It is also believed that the second player is Juan Mata whom the referee allegedly called Spanish t***t.
The club spokesman told reporters, “We have lodged a complaint to the Premier League match delegate with regards to inappropriate language used by the referee and directed at two of our players in two separate incidents.
“The match delegate will pass the complaint to the Football Association. We will make no further comment at this time.”
A highly rated Nigerian referee Gabriel Adigwe who reviewed the incident on SuperSport said specifically on the Fernando Torres incident that Clattenburg error could have happened to many other referees given the way it happened.
“He had a choice to issue a card for simulating or award a free kick. He took the first option based on he perceived from his position even though it turned out to be wrong because replays have proven that there was actually contact,” he said.
The affair is likely to plunge English soccer, which is only just recovering from one damaging scandal surrounding Chelsea after captain John Terry’s ban for racism, straight back into a new crisis involving the European champions.
It was also announced on Monday that FIFA referee Clattenburg would not be officiating at any Premier League matches this weekend.
“Mark Clattenburg is one of the elite referees in world football and, in these circumstances, the intense level of scrutiny would detract from the match and be unfair to the clubs and the supporters of both sides,” said a statement from the Professional Game Match Officials Board, which manages top English referees.
A number of Monday’s British newspapers simply had the headline “Accused” on their back pages.
The Guardian had a banner headline “Ref in Chelsea race row” while the Daily Mail proclaimed “Ref Race Row” although those allegations have not been substantiated.
Chelsea are currently without skipper Terry, who has served two games of a four-match domestic ban for racially abusing Queens Park Rangers defender Anton Ferdinand last year.
That case has blighted English soccer for a year after the former England player was also ordered to appear in court accused of a racially aggravated public order offence, of which he was acquitted.
The FA, however, using different standards of proof to guide its charge, found him guilty and fined him 220,000 pounds ($354,200) as well as banning him. Terry decided not to appeal.
The Durham-born referee was put in charge of the League Cup final in February and the Olympic final between Brazil and Mexico in August. Clattenburg is one of the FIFA candidates to referee at the 2014 World Cup in Brazil.
Former Premier League official Graham Poll has suggested Chelsea’s complaint could hinge on evidence from Clattenburg’s assistants and the fourth official.
Linesmen Michael McDonough and Simon Long and fourth official Michael Jones may have heard conversations between Clattenburg and the players because all four officials wear microphones and ear pieces that allow them to hear what each other is saying during the game.
“A referee’s microphone is on open. Everything he says is heard by (his or her) assistants,” Poll told BBC Radio 5 live.
“So if Mark said something, the assistants would have heard it.”
Clattenburg, no stranger to controversy, was criticised by Chelsea manager Roberto Di Matteo for “ruining” the match.
While Ivanovic could have few complaints after accidentally impeding Ashley Young when the winger was through on goal, the decision to show Torres a second yellow for diving sparked outrage on and off the pitch as he appeared to be clipped.
“We must be disappointed that key decisions were wrong,” Di Matteo told reporters.
“At 2-2, we looked like the team that was going to win the game. It was a good game between good teams and the official ruined it. Key decisions have to be right and you don’t want the referees to have such a big influence.
“I think it’s obvious in the eyes of everybody that the second yellow for Fernando was wrong. It was a foul for us and probably he should have booked their player.
“Their winning goal was an offside goal. It’s a shame a game like that had to be decided by officials in that manner. Surely when he sees it, he will realise that he made big mistakes.”
Torres’ Spanish compatriot Juan Mata, who brought Chelsea back into the game at 2-1 with a stunning free kick, said Torres’s dismissal was “incomprehensible”.
“But I prefer to focus on the positives from the game – we competed against a great opponent and responded well to falling behind,” he added.
An investigation is also being carried by the Metropolitan Police into how a Stamford Bridge steward was injured following Hernandez’s winner. Objects were also seen to be thrown on to the pitch from the stands during the fractious match.
Despite trailing 2-0 and clawing their way back to 2-2, Sunday’s defeat was Chelsea’s first in the Premier League this season but they remained top of the table on 22 points from their opening nine games – one point clear of Manchester United and champions Manchester City.